Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Microsoft.ContainerInstance: Added API version 2024-05-01-preview #28964

Conversation

drishtipeshwani09
Copy link
Contributor

@drishtipeshwani09 drishtipeshwani09 commented May 3, 2024

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

Tip

Overwhelmed by all this guidance? See the Getting help section at the bottom of this PR description.

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

spec_pr_review_workflow_diagram

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check the specific option that applies. This is mandatory!

  • New resource provider.
  • New API version for an existing resource provider. (If API spec is not defined in TypeSpec, the PR should have been created in adherence to OpenAPI specs PR creation guidance).
  • Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
  • Update existing version to fix OpenAPI spec quality issues in S360.
  • Other, please clarify:
    • edit this with your clarification

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

  • I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data plane related specifications.
  • I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
    ARM resource provider contract and
    REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
    I understand this is required before I can proceed to the diagram Step 2, "ARM API changes review", for this PR.

Additional information

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
suppressions guide to get approval.

Getting help

  • First, please carefully read through this PR description, from top to bottom. Please fill out the Purpose of this PR and Due diligence checklist.
  • To understand what you must do next to merge this PR, see the Next Steps to Merge comment. It will appear within few minutes of submitting this PR and will continue to be up-to-date with current PR state.
  • For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure
    and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
  • For help with ARM review (PR workflow diagram Step 2), see https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.
  • If the PR CI checks appear to be stuck in queued state, please add a comment with contents /azp run.
    This should result in a new comment denoting a PR validation pipeline has started and the checks should be updated after few minutes.
  • If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.

Copied the files in a separate commit.
This allows reviewers to easily diff subsequent changes against the previous spec.
Updated the API version from stable/2023-05-01 to preview/2024-05-01-preview.
…Pool to Container Group Properties and ConfigMap to ContainerProperties specs and modified examples
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 3, 2024

Next Steps to Merge

✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! To get your PR merged, see aka.ms/azsdk/specreview/merge.

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 3, 2024

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️❌Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 3 Errors, 7 Warnings failed [Detail]
Compared specs (v0.10.12) new version base version
containerInstance.json 2024-05-01-preview(e2ab4eb) 2023-05-01(main)
containerInstance.json 2024-05-01-preview(e2ab4eb) 2023-02-01-preview(main)

The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest stable version:

Rule Message
1025 - RequiredStatusChange The 'required' status changed from the old version('True') to the new version('False').
New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L861:7
Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2023-05-01/containerInstance.json#L862:7
1025 - RequiredStatusChange The 'required' status changed from the old version('True') to the new version('False').
New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1417:11
Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2023-05-01/containerInstance.json#L1400:11
1025 - RequiredStatusChange The 'required' status changed from the old version('True') to the new version('False').
New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1417:11
Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/stable/2023-05-01/containerInstance.json#L1400:11


The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:

Rule Message
⚠️ 1025 - RequiredStatusChange The 'required' status changed from the old version('True') to the new version('False').
New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L861:7
Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2023-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L853:7
⚠️ 1025 - RequiredStatusChange The 'required' status changed from the old version('True') to the new version('False').
New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1417:11
Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2023-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1391:11
⚠️ 1025 - RequiredStatusChange The 'required' status changed from the old version('True') to the new version('False').
New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1417:11
Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2023-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1391:11
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'provisioningTimeoutInSeconds' renamed or removed?
New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1417:11
Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2023-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1391:11
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'isCustomProvisioningTimeout' renamed or removed?
New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1417:11
Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2023-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1391:11
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'provisioningTimeoutInSeconds' renamed or removed?
New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1417:11
Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2023-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1391:11
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'isCustomProvisioningTimeout' renamed or removed?
New: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1417:11
Old: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2023-02-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1391:11
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️⚠️LintDiff: 2 Warnings warning [Detail]
Compared specs (v2.2.2) new version base version
package-preview-2024-05 package-preview-2024-05(e2ab4eb) default(main)

[must fix]The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

Rule Message Related RPC [For API reviewers]
⚠️ EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans properties are not descriptive in all cases and can make them to use, evaluate whether is makes sense to keep the property as boolean or turn it into an enum.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1573
⚠️ EnumInsteadOfBoolean Booleans properties are not descriptive in all cases and can make them to use, evaluate whether is makes sense to keep the property as boolean or turn it into an enum.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L1610


The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule Message
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'containerGroupName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L113
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L221
PatchIdentityProperty The patch operation body parameter schema should contain property 'identity'.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L249
UnSupportedPatchProperties Mark the top-level property 'location', specified in the patch operation body, as readOnly or immutable. You could also choose to remove it from the request payload of the Patch operation. This property is not patchable.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L249
DeleteResponseCodes Long-running delete operations must have responses with 202, 204 and default return codes. They also must have no other response codes.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L274
DeleteResponseBodyEmpty The delete response body must be empty.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L300
LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L304
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L313
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'containerGroupName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L320
PostResponseCodes Long-running POST operations must have responses with 202 and default return codes. They must also have a 200 return code if only if the final response is intended to have a schema, if not the 200 return code must not be specified. They also must not have other response codes.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L321
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L351
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'containerGroupName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L358
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'containerGroupName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L395
PostResponseCodes Long-running POST operations must have responses with 202 and default return codes. They must also have a 200 return code if only if the final response is intended to have a schema, if not the 200 return code must not be specified. They also must not have other response codes.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L396
LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L420
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L429
OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.ContainerInstance/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L456
OperationsApiSchemaUsesCommonTypes Operations API path must follow the schema provided in the common types.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L457
GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L495
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'containerGroupName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L511
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'containerName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L511
XmsPageableForListCalls x-ms-pageable extension must be specified for LIST APIs.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L512
GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L558
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'containerGroupName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L571
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'containerName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L571
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'containerGroupName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L627
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'containerName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L627
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'containerGroupName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L754
XmsPageableForListCalls x-ms-pageable extension must be specified for LIST APIs.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L755
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'virtualNetworkName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.ContainerInstance/preview/2024-05-01-preview/containerInstance.json#L790
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 3, 2024

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 warning [Detail]
    For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
  • ⚠️Warning in generating from e724d57701ea7efb7c69ede364e185988cb1e9e9. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] Get-ChildItem: /mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:787
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] Line |
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]  787 |  … rtifacts += Get-ChildItem $artifactsPath -Filter *.nupkg -exclude *.s …
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      |                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      | Cannot find path
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      | '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/packages/Debug/' because
    cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1]      | it does not exist.
  • ️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.ContainerInstance [Preview SDK Changes]
    info	[Changelog]
️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python warning [Detail]
    For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
  • ⚠️Warning in generating from e724d57701ea7efb7c69ede364e185988cb1e9e9. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] W: Target Packages (main/binary-amd64/Packages) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] W: Target Packages (main/binary-all/Packages) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] W: Target Translations (main/i18n/Translation-en) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] W: Target CNF (main/cnf/Commands-amd64) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] W: Target CNF (main/cnf/Commands-all) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] W: Target Packages (main/binary-amd64/Packages) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] W: Target Packages (main/binary-all/Packages) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] W: Target Translations (main/i18n/Translation-en) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] W: Target CNF (main/cnf/Commands-amd64) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] W: Target CNF (main/cnf/Commands-all) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.list:1 and /etc/apt/sources.list.d/azure-cli.sources:1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm notice
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 10.7.0 -> 10.8.1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm notice Changelog: https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.8.1
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm notice To update run: npm install -g [email protected]
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm notice
    command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️azure-mgmt-containerinstance [Preview SDK Changes]
    info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog]   - Model Container has a new parameter config_map
    info	[Changelog]   - Model ContainerGroup has a new parameter container_group_profile
    info	[Changelog]   - Model ContainerGroup has a new parameter is_created_from_standby_pool
    info	[Changelog]   - Model ContainerGroup has a new parameter standby_pool_profile
    info	[Changelog]   - Model ContainerGroupProperties has a new parameter container_group_profile
    info	[Changelog]   - Model ContainerGroupProperties has a new parameter is_created_from_standby_pool
    info	[Changelog]   - Model ContainerGroupProperties has a new parameter standby_pool_profile
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
  • ️✔️Succeeded in generating from e724d57701ea7efb7c69ede364e185988cb1e9e9. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-containerinstance-generated [Preview SDK Changes]
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
  • ️✔️Succeeded in generating from e724d57701ea7efb7c69ede364e185988cb1e9e9. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/containerinstance/armcontainerinstance [Preview SDK Changes]
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
  • ️✔️Succeeded in generating from e724d57701ea7efb7c69ede364e185988cb1e9e9. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
    warn	Warning: File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read. Please re-run the pipeline if the error is transitient error or report this issue through https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
    command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️@azure/arm-containerinstance [Preview SDK Changes]
️❌ azure-resource-manager-schemas failed [Detail]
    For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
  • Code Generator Failed in generating from e724d57701ea7efb7c69ede364e185988cb1e9e9. Schema Automation 14.0.0
    command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] Submodule 'bicep-types-az' (https://github.com/Azure/bicep-types-az) registered for path 'bicep-types-az'
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] Cloning into '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/bicep-types-az'...
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] Submodule 'bicep-types' (https://github.com/Azure/bicep-types) registered for path 'bicep-types-az/bicep-types'
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] Cloning into '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/bicep-types-az/bicep-types'...
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 10.7.0 -> 10.8.1
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice Changelog: https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.8.1
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice To update run: npm install -g [email protected]
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice
    error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-resource-manager-schemas]: .sdkauto/initScript.sh
    warn	Warning: File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read. Please re-run the pipeline if the error is transitient error or report this issue through https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
    command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] /mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:500
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     return new TSError(diagnosticText, diagnosticCodes)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]            ^
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] TSError: ⨯ Unable to compile TypeScript:
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(6,20): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'colors' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(10,19): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'yargs' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(11,18): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'path' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(13,35): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'fs' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(14,23): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'strip-ansi' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(42,9): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(53,9): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(69,67): error TS7006: Parameter 'x' implicitly has an 'any' type.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(70,49): error TS7006: Parameter 'f' implicitly has an 'any' type.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(94,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(105,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(106,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(157,13): error TS2591: Cannot find name 'process'. Do you need to install type definitions for node? Try `npm i --save-dev @types/node` and then add 'node' to the types field in your tsconfig.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at createTSError (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:500:12)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at reportTSError (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:504:19)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at getOutput (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:739:36)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Object.compile (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:955:32)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Module.m._compile (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:1043:43)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1422:10)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Object.require.extensions.<computed> [as .ts] (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:1046:12)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1203:32)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Function.Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1019:12)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (node:internal/modules/run_main:128:12)
    error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-resource-manager-schemas]: .sdkauto/generateScript.sh
    warn	Warning: Package processing is skipped as the SDK generation fails. Please look into the above generation errors or report this issue through https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
️️✔️ azure-powershell succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
  • ️✔️Succeeded in generating from e724d57701ea7efb7c69ede364e185988cb1e9e9. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️Az.containerinstance.DefaultTag [Preview SDK Changes]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 3, 2024

@drishtipeshwani09 drishtipeshwani09 marked this pull request as ready for review May 16, 2024 17:09
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added ARMReview new-api-version WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels May 16, 2024
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added SuppressionReviewRequired WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required and removed NotReadyForARMReview labels Jun 25, 2024
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added the ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test label Jun 25, 2024
@drishtipeshwani09
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 4 pipeline(s).

suppressions:
- code: AvoidAdditionalProperties
from: containerInstance.json
reason: Using additionalProperties type as the object is user-defined and not subject to any validations at RP level.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reason

could you please provide the path also using "where", so that the suppression is only valid in those case and not for whole file.

@ramoka178 ramoka178 added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Jun 25, 2024
@openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jun 25, 2024
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview removed the ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test label Jun 25, 2024
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added the ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test label Jun 25, 2024
@drishtipeshwani09
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 4 pipeline(s).

@drishtipeshwani09
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run

@drishtipeshwani09 drishtipeshwani09 removed the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Jun 25, 2024
@openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jun 25, 2024
@ramoka178 ramoka178 added Approved-Suppression ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review labels Jun 25, 2024
@openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jun 25, 2024
@drishtipeshwani09
Copy link
Contributor Author

/pr RequestMerge

Copy link
Contributor

@ramoka178 ramoka178 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving to merge

@ramoka178 ramoka178 merged commit 2b6c728 into Azure:main Jun 26, 2024
30 of 32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Approved-Suppression ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review BreakingChange-Approved-Benign Changes are not breaking at the REST API level and have at most minor impact to generated SDKs. BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required new-api-version ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager SuppressionReviewRequired
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants