-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Collect requirements for downsampled movies coming off of motion correction #412
Comments
For my own purposes, I wrote a quick module to produce mp4 videos of pre- and post- motion corrected movies https://github.com/AllenInstitute/ophys_etl_pipelines/tree/danielsf/dev/downsampled/video I will try to get this reviewed and merged before this ticket is adopted (we're probably going to need it to help evaluate motion correction configurations for the 2022 labeling effort). Hopefully it can serve as a starting point for this discussion. |
When I asked Nick Mei why we adopted webm in the first place, he said it was due to its felicitous compression characteristics and the fact that it was royalty-free. He pointed me to this resource https://blog.pogrebnyak.info/codecs-and-containers-explained/ |
Running
appears to produce the product the scientists want to use for motion correction QC. We should consider replacing our current webm generation code with this in |
Various members of the science team have expressed displeasure working with the webm movies that automatically get produced as a part of our motion correction pipeline. See, for instance
AllenInstitute/brain_observatory_qc#16
We should reach out to them to ask their specific concerns and determine what artifacts we can reasonably produce and store to address their needs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: