Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(ertp): ertp on zones #7116
refactor(ertp): ertp on zones #7116
Changes from all commits
3e43dee
0e10dfa
85e997d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need help. Finally resorted to
any
after everything else I tried failed. I don't understand why this problem arose in this PR but not prior to this PR.I got rid of all the
@typedef
s in case it could help with this, which it did not. But I left the non-@typedef form in anyway because it is now our recommended practice. Preserves type info better in the IDE.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need help. Finally resorted to
any
after everything else I tried failed. I don't understand why this problem arose in this PR but not prior to this PR.I got rid of all the
@typedef
s in case it could help with this, which it did not. But I left the non-@typedef form in anyway because it is now our recommended practice. Preserves type info better in the IDE.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What does
detached()
do? Is there any documentation?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
detached()
is how you ask that a new one always be made, even if it is a durable zone. Withoutdetach()
,issuerZone.setStore('recovery set')
would reuse a'recovery set'
entry inissuerZone
if there is one, and register the newly made one there otherwise. IOW,detached()
is the new way to saymake*SetStore
rather thanprovide*SetStore
.@michaelfig , I leave the documentation question to you. Thanks.