Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the option for multiple solvers #1

Open
haz opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Add the option for multiple solvers #1

haz opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@haz
Copy link
Contributor

haz commented Mar 20, 2020

The solver index should be provided with the solve calls a default being used if it isn't there. Also, an endpoint should be created that lists the solvers.

@Vol0kin
Copy link
Contributor

Vol0kin commented May 6, 2020

Currently I am working on a project and I am using this cloud solver. Being able to choose between multiple solvers could be a very good option since it would allow users to compare them. However, will the output and the output's format be the same for all of them? I am asking this because having information about the preconditions and effects is really useful and I am slightly concerned that maybe other solvers may not be able to provide this kind of information.

@haz
Copy link
Contributor Author

haz commented May 6, 2020

Thanks for the input!

We will in fact host a variety of solvers / utilities, and have a range of API standards. Classical planners should all follow the same API, and the grounded action schema's (which is what I think you are referring to) is actually done in a post-processing step.

So you should be all set once we have things up and running!

@Vol0kin
Copy link
Contributor

Vol0kin commented May 6, 2020

Thank you for your response! I will keep an eye on the next updates and adapt my project so it works with this new feature 😄.

@haz
Copy link
Contributor Author

haz commented Aug 18, 2020

It's going slowly, but it's going here: https://github.com/AI-Planning/planning-as-a-service

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants