Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not working for Real life xrays #8

Open
bijoygit opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Not working for Real life xrays #8

bijoygit opened this issue Mar 14, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@bijoygit
Copy link

I have couple of frontal chest x rays which I know have disease. But when I predict it with the model, it shows very less probability for all the 14 diseases.

It doesn't seem to work on real life X-rays

Please help

@zoogzog
Copy link
Owner

zoogzog commented Mar 15, 2018

The goal of this project was only to implement the method described in the original paper. There are no guarantees that the proposed approach would provide good results for each individual image.

It has to be acknowledged that although the proposed approach of pathology classification with DenseNet showed good results, some researchers expressed opinions that the ChestXray14 dataset is not an ideal candidate for conducting evaluation tests.

@QingguoC
Copy link

Hello, I know you evaluate the model by the AUROC score, but how do you predict one sample from the trained model? After the last sigmoid activation, do you use 0.5 as the threshold for the classification of each disease, or need to calculate the optimal threshold from the training set? Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants