[Deployment] Proxy Deployment from a Factory making use of create2Account

[bxpana]

Add to Community Code and update docs about using create2Account with proxies

Discussed in #639

^{Originally posted by 4NNNN July 28, 2024}

Environment

Testnet

zkSolc Version

latest

zksync-ethers Version

^6.0.0

Hardhat.config.ts

const config: HardhatUserConfig = {
    zksolc: {
        version: 'latest',
        settings: {
            isSystem: true,
            optimizer: {
                fallbackToOptimizingForSize: false,
            },
        },
    },
    typechain: {
        outDir: "typechain",
        target: "ethers-v5",
    },
    defaultNetwork: 'zkSyncTestnet',
    networks: {
        hardhat: {
            zksync: true,
        },
        zkSyncTestnet,
    },
    solidity: {
        compilers: [{ version: '0.8.17' }]
}

Deployment Script (WITHOUT PRIVATE KEY)

const implementationArtifact = await deployer.loadArtifact("CharterWalletImplementation");
  const implementation = await deployer.deploy(implementationArtifact, [], undefined, [])
  const implementationaddr = await implementation.getAddress();
  console.log(`DRIPImplementation: "${implementationaddr}",`);

  //////////////////////////

  // Deploy AccountFactory
  const factoryArtifact = await deployer.loadArtifact("AccountFactory");
  const proxyArtifact = await deployer.loadArtifact("CharterWalletImplementation");
*****************************************************
Why is it aritifact of CharterWallet Implementation and not the proxy artifact is because the implementation implements UUPSupgradble contract!

*****************************************************
  const proxybytecodeHash = utils.hashBytecode(proxyArtifact.deployedBytecode);

  const factory = await deployer.deploy(factoryArtifact, [implementationaddr, proxybytecodeHash, eoawallet.address], undefined, [
    proxyArtifact.bytecode,
  ]);
  const factoryaddr = await factory.getAddress();
  console.log(`DRIPFactory: "${factoryaddr}",`);

Package.json

"zksync-ethers": "^6.0.0",
    "@matterlabs/hardhat-zksync-upgradable": "^1.5.1",
    "@matterlabs/hardhat-zksync-chai-matchers": "^1.3.0",
    "@matterlabs/hardhat-zksync-deploy": "1.1.2",
    "@matterlabs/hardhat-zksync-solc": "1.0.6",
    "@matterlabs/hardhat-zksync-toolbox": "1.2.1",
    "@matterlabs/hardhat-zksync-verify": "1.2.2",
    "@matterlabs/zksync-contracts": "^0.6.1",

Contract Code

import {UUPSUpgradeable} from "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/proxy/utils/UUPSUpgradeable.sol";

import {Initializable} from "@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable/proxy/utils/Initializable.sol";


CharterWalletImplementation is UUPSUpgradeable,Initializable{}

Does this work on other EVMs? (If yes, please list at least 1 of them)

NA

Description of What Your Contract Does

1. I tried deploying a proxy to the wallet implemenation by not implementing a proxy import.

2. So it was just a normal wallet contract but the proxy gets deployed by using hre.zkUpgrades.deployProxy.

3. But while trying to populate a transaction and test it out for token transfers, errored up saying Sender is not an account.

4. Which means you're calling a contract which was not deployed using create2Account or createAccount, so in this case I might have to deploy the proxy for the implementation using a proxy factory.

5. I need reference on how to deploy a proxybytecodehash from the factory with the implementation address as a constructor parameter!

Repo Link (Optional)

No response

Additional Details

No response