Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect opcode type designation for LPSW, SSM, TS, LPTEA #529

Open
abekornelis opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Incorrect opcode type designation for LPSW, SSM, TS, LPTEA #529

abekornelis opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@abekornelis
Copy link
Collaborator

Instructions LPSW, SSM, TS are defined in tz390 as type-S instructions. This should be changed to SI
Instruction LPTEA is defined as an RRE-type instruction. This should be changed to RRF.
For each instruction we should make sure that the opode listing is correct when optable(xxx,LIST) is requested
Also we need to validate that the instructions are assembled correctly, executed correctly, and traced correctly (when tracing is on)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant