Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance YSQL sample apps to allow for variable number of columns #2802

Closed
bmatican opened this issue Oct 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Enhance YSQL sample apps to allow for variable number of columns #2802

bmatican opened this issue Oct 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/bug This issue is a bug priority/medium Medium priority issue

Comments

@bmatican
Copy link
Contributor

bmatican commented Oct 31, 2019

Jira Link: DB-2226
We should allow for both:

  • varying the number of columns in the schema (setup wide tables)
  • varying the number of columns in the read requests (be able to run experiments on 1 large column read vs N smaller columns)

We can then use this to compare perf on

  • select of 1 column of 1000 bytes vs a select of 10 columns of 100 bytes each
  • select of K columns from tables of 10, 50, 100 columns

@spolitov already confirmed from #1877, that, for a given table, select times grow linearly with number of columns.

@bmatican bmatican added the area/docdb YugabyteDB core features label Oct 31, 2019
@bmatican bmatican assigned bmatican and unassigned spolitov Nov 15, 2019
@bmatican
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mbautin I think you had a sample-app PR that might be extendable to cover this too: yugabyte/yb-sample-apps#16

Is that something you'll try to get back to?

@yugabyte-ci yugabyte-ci added kind/bug This issue is a bug priority/medium Medium priority issue labels Jun 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/docdb YugabyteDB core features kind/bug This issue is a bug priority/medium Medium priority issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants