Speech-to-Speech (Zero-Shot Voice Conversion)

[fakerybakery]

Is it possible to implement speech-to-speech somewhat similar to this?

Here's an image of how they do it from the website:

Thanks!

[yl4579]

I think what you mean is voice conversion. I have done this for StyleTTS and it should work for StyleTTS 2 as well. See https://github.com/yl4579/StyleTTS-VC. The idea is you align the text with the input melspectrograms, use the aligned phonemes F0 and energy of the input and a different speaker embedding to reconstruct the speech. The alignment and text can be replaced with some text encoder, as shown in StyleTTS-VC.

[yl4579]

I think this is interesting though, so if someone wants to apply the idea of StyleTTS-VC to StyleTTS 2 and use encoders like https://github.com/auspicious3000/contentvec to better disentangle the speaker information, it'd be greatly appreciated. Unfortunately I don't have the time to do this right now.

[yl4579]

The basic idea would be train an acoustic model using train_first.py (one probably can use the pre-trained LibriTTS model as a start but it needs some alignment due to different hop size and sampling rate), fine-tune contentvec to reconstruct speech while fixing the decoder, then finetune the decoder while fixing the contentvec. This process can be repeated iteratively even, and I believe it can produce better results than RVC (SoVITS). If anyone is interested please email me at [email protected], or reply to this thread for further discussion.

[AWAS666]

So as you mentioned RVC, do you think singing conversion could be possible too?

[Cheneng]

Why you believe that the results of using contentvec + adain is better than contentvec + vits, especially the latter one is the more end to end one.

[yl4579]

@Cheneng the latter is not more end to end because it doesn’t update the speech encoder as far as I know. It extracts the SSL features directly as input without finetuning the encoder. StyleTTS-VC trains both the encoder and the decoder, while SoVITS only trains the decoder.