You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found some possible errors about RF amplitude after the time-to-depth conversion:
By using RFStation module to carry out the time-to-depth conversion
"rfsta.stel = 0
rf_0 = rfsta.psrf2depth()
rfsta.stel = 3000
rf_3 = rfsta.psrf2depth()
rfsta.stel = 5000
rf_5 = rfsta.psrf2depth()"
I got:
It seems that the waveforms are normalized after the station elevation correction, while it is better to normalize the waveform before correcting the station elevation.
I also tried to use rf2depth command to carry out the time-to-depth conversion, and got this:
It seems the RF amplitude normalization process of above two "commands" (RFStation.psrf2depth and rf2depth) is different.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi Mijian,
I found some possible errors about RF amplitude after the time-to-depth conversion:
By using RFStation module to carry out the time-to-depth conversion
"rfsta.stel = 0
rf_0 = rfsta.psrf2depth()
rfsta.stel = 3000
rf_3 = rfsta.psrf2depth()
rfsta.stel = 5000
rf_5 = rfsta.psrf2depth()"
I got:
It seems that the waveforms are normalized after the station elevation correction, while it is better to normalize the waveform before correcting the station elevation.
I also tried to use rf2depth command to carry out the time-to-depth conversion, and got this:
It seems the RF amplitude normalization process of above two "commands" (RFStation.psrf2depth and rf2depth) is different.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions