This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2024. It is now read-only.
Thank you, for the xanmod kernel patch. #362
marioroy
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 1 comment
-
I tried HZ_500 again and left it at default; e.g. disabled change to HZ_1000 in spec file.
Again, thank you for the xanmod kernel patch. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Aloha,
I wish for a low-latency kernel. Who doesn't want that? So, I tried various kernels. The one that stands out is the xanmod kernel with some customization applied.
Low latency results were captured on Fedora 38.
https://pastebin.com/zF7EyJXu
My custom (tinkered spec) kernel-xanmod lives in gist.
https://gist.github.com/marioroy/263bb5946da8ea63e0d35f9d6912b97c
Please, do tell me if you dislike the customization. I've been running this for several weeks under varied work loads. Perhaps, I do not need to change the tick rate. The reason is that my CPU fan runs louder with HZ_500 for some reason (similar work loads). I have sensitive hearing and noticed it immediately running the xanmod kernel as is. I misplaced the URL where I received the inspiration to change the tick rate to 1000 for the xanmod kernel. Maybe, I need to revisit the 500 HZ again.
I documented in the spec file where I received the inspiration for the customization. Keeping RCU_LAZY disabled resulted in better performance for me. CachyOS has it enabled.
Blessings and grace,
Mario
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions