You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a lambda is in a context where effect checking is enabled -- e.g. the lambda is within a file that is effect-checked (see issue #293) or it is within a function that is annotated with effects - then the lambda should be effect checked and an effect should be part of its type.
I'm marking this as a bug (not an enhancement) because there is no way to get effects checked on a lambda without this, and the effect system is unsound for lambdas without this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When a lambda is in a context where effect checking is enabled -- e.g. the lambda is within a file that is effect-checked (see issue #293) or it is within a function that is annotated with effects - then the lambda should be effect checked and an effect should be part of its type.
I'm marking this as a bug (not an enhancement) because there is no way to get effects checked on a lambda without this, and the effect system is unsound for lambdas without this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: