Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some OctetString IEs should accept binary #82

Open
wmnsk opened this issue Apr 26, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Some OctetString IEs should accept binary #82

wmnsk opened this issue Apr 26, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@wmnsk
Copy link
Owner

wmnsk commented Apr 26, 2021

Some of the IE fields that are defined as OctetString type should perhaps accept []byte or something instead of string in their constructors, as they expect more complicated contents than just a string (and most of which are defined in another specification 😡).

e.g., PortManagementInformationContainer, BridgeManagementInformationContainer

This is just a reminder issue, to be considered some time later (hopefully).

@wmnsk wmnsk changed the title Some OctetString IEs might be easier to handle as binary Some OctetString IEs should accept binary Apr 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant