You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Probably doesn't come up much but I have a book with the following which produces ERROR: unknown dot command.
A galvanometer shunt bears a definite ratio to the resistance
of the galvanometer, being usually adjusted so that only .1,
>> .01, or .001 part of the current passes through the galvanometer.
Easy to work around but perhaps you could give a pass to ^\.\d+ lines?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Probably doesn't come up much but I have a book with the following
which produces ERROR: unknown dot command.
|A galvanometer shunt bears a definite ratio to the resistance of the
galvanometer, being usually adjusted so that only .1, >> .01, or .001
part of the current passes through the galvanometer. |
Easy to work around but perhaps you could give a pass to |^.\d+| lines?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #87.
Thanks for the report.
I'm not sure that's the right fix, though I'll consider it. An
alternative (which also requires a code change) would be to allow use of
\ to escape the "." character.
I'm not sure which of those is more appropriate, but either would work.
Your suggestion wouldn't require any work on the part of the PPer, but
if there are other situations that could have a "." in position 1 then
the \ workaround might be necessary for those, anyway.
Probably doesn't come up much but I have a book with the following which produces ERROR: unknown dot command.
Easy to work around but perhaps you could give a pass to
^\.\d+
lines?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: