We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Instead of a bunch of array's in array's,
"__tasks__": [ [ "Check.auth.isAdmin", "< input.auth" ] ]
It could just be an evaluated string. This makes it easily recognizable as code that is being run.
"__tasks__": [ "Check.auth.isAdmin( this.input.auth )" ]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Populater will have to register all the rules/tasks methods for that to work
Sorry, something went wrong.
@mottersheadt Example of restrictive syntax
Avoid looking like code so that we don't have to support other typical code operations
"__tasks__": [ "Check.auth.isAdmin | input.auth, params.hello, hey()" ]
Idea for non-restrictive reference replacement syntax
"__tasks__": [ "=Check.auth.isAdmin( =input.auth=, =params.hello=, =hey()= )=" ]
No branches or pull requests
Instead of a bunch of array's in array's,
It could just be an evaluated string. This makes it easily recognizable as code that is being run.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: