You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
nairnandu: based on our last discussion, are there data points that we can move upstream as optional fields in the proposal template?
jgraham: moving some of the data requirements into the proposal template would make sense.
boazsender: aside from the proposal template, I think we should still discuss what data is reasonable to collect. We can do that next time when we have the full group
jgraham: makes sense to have a shared location for the data associated with a proposal.
AI: Add to the agenda for next meeting since there is a small group in attendance today
jgraham: changing the test-set to include only the ones that test interoperability seems to be a reasonable thing to do
gsnedders: for BSF we do pass tests where pre-condition fails
jgraham: one of the problems with BSF is that the tests are not sufficiently curated. The easy way would be to remove tests for codecs that are not supported on all 3 engines
Here is the proposed agenda for the July 20th meeting:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: