Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

further details for authenticatorCancel operation #116

Closed
equalsJeffH opened this issue Jun 1, 2016 · 9 comments
Closed

further details for authenticatorCancel operation #116

equalsJeffH opened this issue Jun 1, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

We may wish to add to the authenticatorCancel operation description some considerations for rolling back state (counters, keys, etc.)

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor Author

see also #125

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor Author

see also issue #292

@AngeloKai AngeloKai modified the milestones: WD-07, CR Aug 30, 2017
@AngeloKai
Copy link
Contributor

I am moving the issue back to WD-07 because I am addressing the cancel issues together at once.

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AngeloKai said:

I am moving the issue back to WD-07 because I am addressing the cancel issues together at once.

Ok, changing assignee to @AngeloKai

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH assigned AngeloKai and unassigned equalsJeffH Oct 16, 2017
@jcjones jcjones modified the milestones: WD-07, CR Oct 25, 2017
@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH modified the milestones: WD-07, CR Nov 1, 2017
@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor Author

equalsJeffH commented Nov 9, 2017

@jcjones notes in webauthn f2f tpac 2017-11-09: that we ought to have some hand-wavy general impl-cons for authnrs

i.e. for cancellation, go look at the transport specs... (ie ctap subsections)

@nadalin
Copy link
Contributor

nadalin commented Nov 9, 2017

@selfissued Mike please add a sentence in the implementation section to say this is job of the transport specs (CTAP)

@jcjones
Copy link
Contributor

jcjones commented Nov 9, 2017

(and U2F, which leaves it undefined but still isn't webauthn's problem...)

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH self-assigned this Dec 6, 2017
@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor Author

on 6-Dec-2017 webauthn call: move to this to PR milestone, we'll have more data wrt the "authenticator model" spec section's level of abstraction.

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH modified the milestones: CR, PR Dec 6, 2017
@AngeloKai
Copy link
Contributor

The CTAP spec described the detailed workings of canceling authenticator operation and the current webauthn spec described the rough model of authenticator cancel works: https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#authenticatorcancel. I don't see a need to further define authenticator cancel operation. Therefore, closing the issue for now.

@equalsJeffH can you please inform me what further detail you think we should provide? If so, we can re-open the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment