You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I recently ran into this issue, with odoo-await (caused by connecting to http port 80, while specifying https):
Error: write EPROTO 140596194441088:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version number:../deps/openssl/openssl/ssl/record/ssl3_record.c:332:
While investigating the issue it came to my attention that the xmlrpc library this project depends on has not been maintained for 5 years, and many of its dependencies for just as long. Given this, would it make sense to replace xmlrpc with a package that is currently maintained?
Edit: Looking around, I am not sure there is a good replacement. Some appear to be unmaintained forks, while others lack documentation, such as @foxglove/xmlrpc . Its possible that the unmaintained 5 year old package is still suitable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the suggestion, looking into this. But yeah, back when I first published the library I did some research and couldn't find any suitable replacements. Not sure if things have changed.
It is meant to support one of the company's software products, but I think it would work as a general XML RPC client. I asked in their slack channel and they confirmed it should.
I recently ran into this issue, with
odoo-await
(caused by connecting to http port 80, while specifying https):While investigating the issue it came to my attention that the
xmlrpc
library this project depends on has not been maintained for 5 years, and many of its dependencies for just as long. Given this, would it make sense to replacexmlrpc
with a package that is currently maintained?Edit: Looking around, I am not sure there is a good replacement. Some appear to be unmaintained forks, while others lack documentation, such as @foxglove/xmlrpc . Its possible that the unmaintained 5 year old package is still suitable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: