Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Limiting the use of [JMeq_eq] #5

Open
YaZko opened this issue Feb 13, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Limiting the use of [JMeq_eq] #5

YaZko opened this issue Feb 13, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@YaZko
Copy link
Contributor

YaZko commented Feb 13, 2022

We currently use dependent inductions and destructions with no afterthoughts, leading [JMeq_eq] and [eq_rect_eq] to be pervasive to the whole development.

In the Interaction Trees development, @Lysxia went to great trouble (DeepSpec/InteractionTrees#194) to identify strictly the lemmas requiring those axioms, and showed in the process that a great deal of things can be achieved without them.

We may want to undergo a similar introspection at some point.
@YaZko YaZko added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@YaZko