Review packages for the whole platform and components

[amedranogil]

ensure the java packages follow a convention and that each component has it's packages defined according to that convention.
Ontologies already have this, but other EG surely do not.

[cstockloew]

agreed, but what convention do you mean?

A good point to start is the javadoc:
https://universaal.github.io/platform/apidocs/index.html

It contains a list of all packages. Most of it seems to be OK. A first look reveals:

• ucc should have package org.universAAL.tools.ucc.* instead of org.universAAL.ucc.*
• zigbee uses org.universAAL.hw.* instead of org.universAAL.lddi.*

Do you mean this?

[amedranogil]

yes, but with more carefull examination:

• ..commerce.ustore.tools move to ..tools
• ..configurable.module should be ..middlware.module.configuration (or similar)
• drools is inside context, reasoner
• ..lddi.adapter (?)
• ..managers,api vs modules (use single concention, I like the second, in the api docs list the api is at top)
• ..mw.tracker (?)
• all ..support may better be renamed in to better package names.
• ..ui.handler.web (!) this one is easy.
• ..kinect is a ui.handler
• all junit packages should be something like ..middleware.container.junit{.bus|.mwtest} (actually this could also be a proposal to rename their respective project names and folders inside mw.core)
• ..ioc.dependencies is an utility library
• ..log, which module defines this package (WHY!??)

[cstockloew]

all junit packages should be something like ..middleware.container.junit{.bus|.mwtest} (actually this could also be a proposal to rename their respective project names and folders inside mw.core)

I prefer to have the container (core, osgi, junit) at the end

[cstockloew]

..log, which module defines this package (WHY!??)

ri.gateway.multitenant, can you change it?

[amedranogil]

Yes, I remember I had this discussion with @kismet the communication layer of the MTGW is all done using standard loging, that package holds the helper methods to do that; there is quite some loging; but I'll look into it.