correctCoordGPS error message : GPS and relative coordinates are not of the same dimension

[billy34]

          when correcting the GPS coordinates I get this: 

Error in correctCoordGPS(longlat = coorde.[, c("Long", "Lat")], coordRel = datos[, :
GPS and relative coordinates are not of the same dimension

how can I fix it?

Originally posted by @christianangulo450 in #13 (comment)

[billy34]

Hello Christian
It will help a lot if you provide a minimum reproducible example that generate this error. You can use for example reprex package for that.

[billy34]

It's likely that your coorde. and your datos dataframes do not have the same number of rows (or columns). Can you check that ?

[christianangulo450]

thank billy, it helped me.

[christianangulo450]

I have another doubt, for the graph of AGB by subplot with the code:
AGB <- summaryByPlot(dbtrnd$AGB, dbtrnd$subplot, drawPlot = TRUE, subplot = subplot)

I get the graph with the AGB [["polygon"]] data and not with the AGB [["AGB"]] data.

how can I fix that?

[MaximeRM]

Hi Christian,
without a reproducible example it is really difficult to understand your problem. Can you please give us a code that reproduce the error?

[christianangulo450]

hello dear Maxime,
the code I entered is
AGB <- summaryByPlot(dbtrnd$AGB, dbtrnd$subplot, drawPlot = TRUE, subplot = subplot)

y me sale como resultado:

print(AGB)
$AGB
plot AGB
1 TRD_0_0 142.18022
2 TRD_0_1 146.48893
3 TRD_1_0 77.91943
4 TRD_1_1 168.27872
5 TRD_2_0 201.50547
6 TRD_2_1 236.28042
7 TRD_3_0 13.91974
8 TRD_3_1 62.36976
9 TRD_0_3 184.82701
10 TRD_1_3 338.63208
11 TRD_3_2 148.09897
12 TRD_3_3 209.29813
13 TRD_2_2 201.05035
14 TRD_2_3 156.03339
15 TRD_1_2 110.43377
16 TRD_0_2 145.61937

$polygon
Simple feature collection with 16 features and 2 fields
Geometry type: POLYGON
Dimension: XY
Bounding box: xmin: 672757.4 ymin: 9558864 xmax: 672857.4 ymax: 9558964
CRS: NA
First 10 features:
plot AGB polygon
1 TRD_0_0 2274.8835 POLYGON ((672757.4 9558964,...
2 TRD_1_0 1246.7108 POLYGON ((672782.4 9558964,...
3 TRD_2_0 3224.0875 POLYGON ((672807.4 9558964,...
4 TRD_3_0 222.7159 POLYGON ((672832.4 9558964,...
5 TRD_0_1 2343.8229 POLYGON ((672757.4 9558939,...
6 TRD_1_1 2692.4594 POLYGON ((672782.4 9558939,...
7 TRD_2_1 3780.4867 POLYGON ((672807.4 9558939,...
8 TRD_3_1 997.9162 POLYGON ((672832.4 9558939,...
9 TRD_0_2 2329.9099 POLYGON ((672757.4 9558914,...
10 TRD_1_2 1766.9403 POLYGON ((672782.4 9558914,...

and in the subplots graph it gives me the biomass with the data from:
AGB$polygon
o because it is that in the lower part of the plot it looks like a legend indicating the biomass of AGB$polygon. To be able to explain it a little bit, I can't understand that.

[ArthurBailly]

The problem was that Christiana didn't understand that :

• the output data frame ($AGB) was the AGB per hectare in each subplot
• the output polygons ($polygon) was just the total AGB per polygon (not per hectare)
  In her defense, the documentation doesn't give any details about that !
  In a future summaryByPlot version, the documentation will be clear, I promise :)