We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pending upstream ticket RockefellerArchiveCenter/pisces#523 , we need the ability to validate using a proper schema.
Previously we've maintained a local Pypi distribution. Instead, we've chosen to fork the rac_schemas repository available https://github.com/RockefellerArchiveCenter/rac_schemas.
Mentioned above
This local is expected to be transient pending upstream development.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Add rac-schemas as local submodule #2
3dfabe5
1e44526
Merge pull request #2 from ulsdevteam/base
3721b3b
Update from upstream
Merge pull request #5 from ulsdevteam/localize-racschemas
6af4ea8
No branches or pull requests
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Pending upstream ticket RockefellerArchiveCenter/pisces#523 , we need the ability to validate using a proper schema.
Describe the solution you'd like
Previously we've maintained a local Pypi distribution. Instead, we've chosen to fork the rac_schemas repository available https://github.com/RockefellerArchiveCenter/rac_schemas.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Mentioned above
Additional context
This local is expected to be transient pending upstream development.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: