You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are going to be N characters in the input file. I think the proper way to handle these would be NOT to include any kmers containing N. As it is now, we throw away the entire read if any of the characters are N.
When we store the read, we could store the entire sequence, N and all, but that would mess up our 4-letter, 2-bit representation. For simplicity, I guess we could throw those reads away from the the ReadHead. But I still think the other non-N kmers should be included in the graph.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are going to be N characters in the input file. I think the proper
way to handle these would be NOT to include any kmers containing N. As it
is now, we throw away the entire read if any of the characters are N.
When we store the read, we could store the entire sequence, N and all, but
that would mess up our 4-letter, 2-bit representation. For simplicity, I
guess we could throw those reads away from the the ReadHead. But I still
think the other non-N kmers should be included in the graph.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/69
.
There are going to be
N
characters in the input file. I think the proper way to handle these would be NOT to include any kmers containingN
. As it is now, we throw away the entire read if any of the characters areN
.When we store the read, we could store the entire sequence, N and all, but that would mess up our 4-letter, 2-bit representation. For simplicity, I guess we could throw those reads away from the the ReadHead. But I still think the other non-
N
kmers should be included in the graph.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: