We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
store_item takes the StorageItem by value, even though it is only passed by reference to StorageItem::serialize_into.
store_item
StorageItem::serialize_into
Is this an oversight or is there a bigger idea behind this?
(my StorageItem is rather big and expensiv to Clone. I would prefer to be able to continue using it, after storing it)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Oh, there's no idea behind it. Wouldn't call it an oversight though, it just never came up as a problem.
We could change it. Seems fair. Are you willing to make a PR? If you do, also include it as a breaking change in the changelog.
Since it's a breaking change, I probably don't want to release it until #19 is ready.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
store_item
takes the StorageItem by value, even though it is only passed by reference toStorageItem::serialize_into
.Is this an oversight or is there a bigger idea behind this?
(my StorageItem is rather big and expensiv to Clone. I would prefer to be able to continue using it, after storing it)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: