You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There should be only one way to encode these fields/positions/types. I favour the method use by QA-Catalogue but maybe in a slightly different way (see dini-ag-kim/avram#51).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
MARC21 bibliographic fields 006 007 and 008 have multple definitions depending in publication type.
By now there are multiple methods to encode these fields:
As part of the field identifier (used by marc-schema in
007
and008
):Special key
types
(used by QA Catalogue):Additional level at the
positions
element (used by marc-schema in006
)There should be only one way to encode these fields/positions/types. I favour the method use by QA-Catalogue but maybe in a slightly different way (see dini-ag-kim/avram#51).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: