Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

client/http: use KeyRange to differentiate the encoding format of the key #7449

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

JmPotato
Copy link
Member

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #7300.

What is changed and how does it work?

Use `KeyRange` to differentiate the encoding format of the key.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

Release note

None.

@JmPotato JmPotato added component/api HTTP API. component/client Client logic. labels Nov 27, 2023
@JmPotato JmPotato requested review from rleungx and HuSharp November 27, 2023 06:56
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • HuSharp
  • rleungx

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 27, 2023
@JmPotato JmPotato force-pushed the refine_http_client_key_range branch from db8362f to d9dc062 Compare November 27, 2023 07:03
client/http/types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JmPotato JmPotato force-pushed the refine_http_client_key_range branch from d9dc062 to f29b531 Compare November 27, 2023 07:19
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 27, 2023
@JmPotato JmPotato force-pushed the refine_http_client_key_range branch from f29b531 to 70907e2 Compare November 27, 2023 07:20
@JmPotato JmPotato requested a review from rleungx November 27, 2023 07:20
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #7449 (fdeda3f) into master (58e9b20) will decrease coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 52.63%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7449      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.25%   74.17%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         451      451              
  Lines       49587    49593       +6     
==========================================
- Hits        36820    36787      -33     
- Misses       9470     9504      +34     
- Partials     3297     3302       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.17% <52.63%> (-0.08%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 27, 2023
@JmPotato JmPotato force-pushed the refine_http_client_key_range branch from 70907e2 to fdeda3f Compare November 27, 2023 07:36
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 27, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Nov 27, 2023
@JmPotato
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2023

@JmPotato: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2023

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: fdeda3f

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 27, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 9f4803d into tikv:master Nov 27, 2023
24 of 26 checks passed
@JmPotato JmPotato deleted the refine_http_client_key_range branch November 27, 2023 07:55
@JmPotato JmPotato mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2023
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component/api HTTP API. component/client Client logic. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants