Skip to content

Is --proxy-headers applied in the uvicorn CMD in the image? #329

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I think nope, because it depended on what is available to Gunicorn, and that can also be passed to the Uvicorn workers.

On the other side, now that Uvicorn supports managing workers with --workers, including restarting dead ones, there's no need for Gunicorn. That also means that it's much simpler to build a Docker image from scratch now, I updated the docs to explain it.

Because of that, I deprecated this Docker image: https://github.com/tiangolo/uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker#-warning-you-probably-dont-need-this-docker-image

Replies: 2 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by tiangolo
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #241 on August 25, 2024 04:05.