Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

failed to decrypt rmb response in the dashboard #1288

Open
Omarabdul3ziz opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

failed to decrypt rmb response in the dashboard #1288

Omarabdul3ziz opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
rmb-sdk belongs to rmb type_bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@Omarabdul3ziz
Copy link
Contributor

with both rmb clients (ts,go) connections from specific twin (ops wallet) to specific node (1,10,...) failed.

ashraf/hanafy suspect that the pk of the caller twin was corrupted at sometime and called the node, which cached this pk and it will never invalidate it, so after the pk fixed again the node still encrypt the response with the corrupted pk. and so we can't decrypt the response in the client side.

  • reproduce and validate that it is the invalid cache
  • could the pk change? should we invalidate?
@Omarabdul3ziz Omarabdul3ziz self-assigned this Dec 16, 2024
@Omarabdul3ziz Omarabdul3ziz added type_bug Something isn't working rmb-sdk belongs to rmb labels Dec 16, 2024
@Omarabdul3ziz Omarabdul3ziz added this to the v0.17.x milestone Dec 16, 2024
@Omarabdul3ziz
Copy link
Contributor Author

debugging this we faced two other issues:

  • some nodes gives an error send on closed channel when calling from sdk v0.16.0 works fine with v0.15.18
  • there is a conflict in the dep go-subkey between the sdk repo and the chain client. Using v1 and v2.

I will open separate issues for both problems

@Omarabdul3ziz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rmb-sdk belongs to rmb type_bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants