Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cost effective lodash #592

Closed
nike1v opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Cost effective lodash #592

nike1v opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@nike1v
Copy link

nike1v commented Mar 15, 2024

Please replace lodash with it's smaller representatives, there are only 4 imports, this shouldn't take long.
Appreciate it!

@gnapse
Copy link
Member

gnapse commented Mar 19, 2024

Contributions are welcome on this one. I'm unlikely to do it anytime soon.

Also, since jest-dom is not normally used in a production web app, but in the development environment only, the bundle size is of less concern. But I'm open to doing better.

Idea: we could cross-reference our use of lodash with https://youmightnotneed.com/lodash/

@gnapse gnapse added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Mar 19, 2024
@re-taro re-taro mentioned this issue Mar 22, 2024
4 tasks
@gnapse
Copy link
Member

gnapse commented Apr 1, 2024

Closed via #593

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants