Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non-convergence plot features #46

Open
juliannosambatti opened this issue Nov 10, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Non-convergence plot features #46

juliannosambatti opened this issue Nov 10, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@juliannosambatti
Copy link
Contributor

juliannosambatti commented Nov 10, 2016

Overall, plots that did not converge did not converge in Aspen. Those plots have Aspen stands with very low basal area (<0.85) and low to medium densities ( between 30 and 90), and medium ages (tage~50), and short topheight (<8) indicating Aspen stands with thin/short individuals. This seems to be valid for SW as well. small basal areas, topheight and densities lead to slower convergence, and some to non-convergence. A few of these plots may not even be classified as forests.

The main question is whether or not we should just ignore Aspen and/or SW in these plots. And, if so, what is the cut-off value. This is more a forestry-related question than a code-related question. It may be the case that some of these plots are not even forests and should be ignored altogether.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant