Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

link to isLeastSpecificTargetCategoryQuantityInclusive needs to be updated #102

Open
ymgan opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Comments

@ymgan
Copy link

ymgan commented May 6, 2024

Hey,

I believe the link to the isLeastSpecificTargetCategoryQuantityInclusive document in the term's comment needs to be updated

Recommended values are 'true' and 'false'. This term is only relevant if dwc:organismQuantity is a number. For a detailed explanation, see http://rs.tdwg.org/eco/docs/inclusive/.

to

Recommended values are 'true' and 'false'. This term is only relevant if dwc:organismQuantity is a number. For a detailed explanation, see https://eco.tdwg.org/inclusive/.

Do I need to open an issue for term change request for this? Thanks a lot!!

@baskaufs
Copy link
Collaborator

baskaufs commented May 6, 2024

The link should be to the document's permanent URL, not the one to which it is redirected. It looks like the problem is that there is an unnecessary "s" in "docs". It should be http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/doc/inclusive/

@baskaufs
Copy link
Collaborator

baskaufs commented May 6, 2024

I think the best thing is to open a term change request in the Darwin Core Issue tracker, since the DwC Maintenance Group would be fixing it and they might not look at the issues here.

@ymgan
Copy link
Author

ymgan commented May 6, 2024

ah, that makes sense! I will open an issue there! Thanks @baskaufs!!

@ymgan
Copy link
Author

ymgan commented May 6, 2024

I hope I did it right - tdwg/dwc#516

@ymgan
Copy link
Author

ymgan commented May 6, 2024

OH ... hang on ... should I open the change term request in this repo instead? I am a bit confused ...

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member

tucotuco commented May 7, 2024

@ymgan The issue on the dwc repository is fine. It is good to have the issue here as well so that anyone watching this repository and not the other will be aware of the change request. Thank you for the careful eye.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants