-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, eventual isotopes cannot be annotated #144
Labels
feature
a feature request or enhancement
Comments
Also linked to #141 |
Adafede
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 2, 2024
Adafede
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 2, 2024
Adafede
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 2, 2024
Adafede
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 2, 2024
Adafede
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 2, 2024
Merged
Should be done, just needs checks with actual examples |
Linked to HUPO-PSI/mzTab#211 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'm always frustrated when I know a fragmented species corresponds to, for example, [+1M+H]+ instead of [M+H]+ but I cannot take this information into account
Describe the solution you'd like
In such case, shift the masses for both MS1 and MS2 annotations.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Not allowing such weird things and fragment the correct species instead
Additional context
Try to look at the best notation for such species
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: