Conference call with Luen

[gnolnait]

Hi all, I've received a reply from Dr. Luen about our request for holding a conference call with him during class so we can ask questions about his work and regarding our project. He has suggested scheduling the call at the beginning of class next Tuesday, November 19. Is that feasible for us?

[joyyqchen]

That sounds great!
On Nov 14, 2013 4:05 PM, "gnolnait" [email protected] wrote:

Hi all, I've received a reply from Dr. Luen about our request for holding
a conference call with him during class so we can ask questions about his
work and regarding our project. He has suggested scheduling the call at the
beginning of class next Tuesday, November 19. Is that feasible for us?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/37
.

[rerock]

If we are going to have a conference call on Tuesday, maybe we should plan ahead and make a list of the questions we want to ask Luen? The point of contacts from each group hasnt met for a while, maybe we should meet up first? To talk about what we are doing, the things we want to accomplish and our questions? @lauraccunningham @carlshan I guess i will send out an email, wish me luck ;)

[carlshan]

@wliang88 : Yes agreed, we should meet this weekend or on Monday!

[tandrasfay]

Our group (Quakers) wanted to ask whether it matters if we restrict our earthquakes to body-type magnitude like Luen did in his paper. (Mentioned on page 21).

[gnolnait]

is there a distinction in our data (body wave magnitude vs. moment
magnitude)?

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:28 PM, tandrasfay [email protected]:

Our group (Quakers) wanted to ask whether it matters if we restrict our
earthquakes to body-type magnitude like Luen did in his paper. (Mentioned
on page 21).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/37#issuecomment-28666063
.

[tandrasfay]

In the original SCEC dataset there is but the csv file on dropbox doesn't say which magnitude type we are looking at.