Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion about ReactiveVariable vs ValueHolder #17

Open
BenjaminVanRyseghem opened this issue Aug 12, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Discussion about ReactiveVariable vs ValueHolder #17

BenjaminVanRyseghem opened this issue Aug 12, 2014 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@BenjaminVanRyseghem
Copy link
Member

Issue to discuss point of view about renaming NewValueHolder into ReactiveVariable

@BenjaminVanRyseghem
Copy link
Member Author

This are the first answers provided by Google searching for: 'ValueHolder'

So I have to think that for a new comer, ValueHolder is not what it's to be expected.
And as it was previously discussed in the mailing list, ValueHolder is not really reflecting the behavior of the class which is to trigger an event each time the value it contains is changed.

@StephanEggermont
Copy link

The Groovy one has exactly the same behavior. The others also seem to be more or less consistent with Bobby Woolf in 1994 in http://c2.com/ppr/vmodels.html Java of course has an issue with overcoming static typing problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants