Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to provide the "authoritativeConcept" parameter to distinguish Concepts in tested scheme vs. aligned concepts #8

Open
tfrancart opened this issue Sep 10, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@tfrancart
Copy link
Collaborator

See https://github.com/cmader/qSKOS/blob/master/README.rdoc#label-What+are+-22Authoritative+Concepts-22-3F

qSkos guesses which concepts are "authoritatives" vs. concepts that are "external" by examining the host part of the URI only. This is problematic when checking mapping relations between vocabularies that are in the same namespace : since RDFS inference is applied, mapped URIs are typed Concept, and if they have the same base URI, they are validated as well as authoritative concepts.

An option should be added to the input form to provide the substring of the URI that defines which are authoritative concepts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant