If we have a port and a corresponding transceiver with the following configuration and capability, which app should xcvrd choose for the port?

speed: 100G
lanes: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7
module supported application: 100GAUI-2, 100GAUI-4

This is a good question to discuss. From my POV, we should try lane number 8->4->2->1. So, I would prefer 100GAUI-4 in this case. @prgeor, @mihirpat1 , what do you think?

Does configuring the breakout setting solve the problem?

As for the example you showed,

speed: 100G
lanes: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7
module supported application: 100GAUI-2, 400GAUI-8

How about setting the breakout configuration like below?

$ config interface breakout Ethernet240 "4x100G"

@ishidawataru CMISmanager will select the application based upon what is there in the config DB's PORT table. Please share your CONFIG_DB'S PORT table dump here for 100G speed.

@prgeor The current CMIS manager implementation searches for a module application that matches both speed and host lane counts. @Junchao-Mellanox is pointing out this behavior causes port link down with the following configuration and needs improvement.

When CMIS manager is enabled, following configuration will cause port link down:

speed: 100G
lanes: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7
module supported application: 100GAUI-2, 400GAUI-8

I initially agreed and implemented sonic-net/sonic-platform-daemons#507 as a draft PR.
However, after that, I realized that we can change the host lane counts by configuring DPB, which should also fix the problem without any modification to the current implementation.

Currently, I'm waiting for @Junchao-Mellanox's response.

Hi @ishidawataru , DPB is not a perfect solution for this. As far as I know, DPB has many limitations, for example, it cannot automatically adjust other port related configuration when doing DPB. Also, it is not user friendly to ask sonic user to do an extra DPB configuration when hit this.

@Junchao-Mellanox Does the SAI require any modification to support this? What happens when the port is configured as 100G with lanes 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 on the platform with 50G/lane for example? Will lanes 0 and 1 be used in this case?

Hi @ishidawataru , it depends on how vendor implement this. Currently, I don't see a problem on nvidia platform regarding SAI.

@Junchao-Mellanox How does the NVIDIA SAI choose the lanes to use for a speed configuration if there are multiple choices?
When the switch ASIC supports multiple lane speeds, I think we have the same problem that I mentioned above for the switch ASIC.

If we have a port and a corresponding transceiver with the following configuration and capability, which app should xcvrd choose for the port?

speed: 100G
lanes: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7
module supported application: 100GAUI-2, 100GAUI-4

Does the NVIDIA SAI choose the lane counts as you mentioned?

From my POV, we should try lane number 8->4->2->1.

If that is the case, does it make sense to spec this behavior in SAI so that the xcvrd implementation can work with non-NVIDIA SAI?

Hi @ishidawataru , this is not a problem for ASIC side configuration. User has the ability to choose how many lanes shall be used by ASIC. Here is the sonic config:

config interface type Ethernet0 CR2 (2 means 2 lanes)

@Junchao-Mellanox I see, in that case, can xcvrd use that configuration as a hint to choose the module application?