Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HAR format Cookies derived from DevTools Cookie objects have incorrect dates #122

Open
UppaJung opened this issue Sep 28, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@UppaJung
Copy link

: dayjs(cookie.expires).toISOString(),

formatCookie can be called with cookie objects created by the tough-cookie's Cookie.parse method or by directly passing cookies in DevTools Protocol format. When cookies are in DevTools format, the expiration field is in seconds from the unix epoch, whereas dayjs interprets numeric inputs as milliseconds from the unix epoch. So, if this field is a number, it needs to be multiplied by 1000 before being passed to dayjs. Currently, cookies from DevTools format all appear to expire in the 1970s.

A minimalist fix might be (though I haven't tested it):

        : dayjs(typeof cookie.expires === "number" ? cookie.expires * 1000 : cookie.expires).toISOString(),

I discovered the issue while experimenting with porting/re-writing chrome-har in typescript and trying to replicate chrome-har's current behavior. Please feel free to compare against the typescript implementation to test the fix, or to adopt the code from it, which is also MIT license. (You're free to take the whole thing, but it's a very big change of coding style to adapt to if you don't like typescript.) Sorry that the first you are hearing from me is me filing bugs, but leaving them unreported seemed worse than the alternative.

@soulgalore
Copy link
Member

Hi @UppaJung thanks for the creating the issues, I'll go over them the next weekend (5th of October) and see which bugs are fixable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants