You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The upgrade from CMS 4 to CMS 5 support involved a single number change in composer.json. I propose this should have been ^4 || ^5 instead.
There is no dependency difference between the two branches (no API change was needed for CMS 5 support), and fixes from the main branch are having to be "backported" (#58 & #59) to the CMS 4 branch, where rebase "merging" has occurred - diverging the commit history. This likely makes the normal "merge-up" routine more difficult.
Simplifying maintainer support by changing the framework requirement (and probably removing the CMS requirement too - no code relies on it) would make things easier for everyone until such time that an actual codebase deviation is required for multiple version support.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The upgrade from CMS 4 to CMS 5 support involved a single number change in
composer.json
. I propose this should have been^4 || ^5
instead.There is no dependency difference between the two branches (no API change was needed for CMS 5 support), and fixes from the main branch are having to be "backported" (#58 & #59) to the CMS 4 branch, where rebase "merging" has occurred - diverging the commit history. This likely makes the normal "merge-up" routine more difficult.
Simplifying maintainer support by changing the framework requirement (and probably removing the CMS requirement too - no code relies on it) would make things easier for everyone until such time that an actual codebase deviation is required for multiple version support.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: