We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The following shape parses:
<Shape> IRI // <label> "My shape" { <p> . }
while the following doesn't:
<Shape> // <label> "My shape" { <p> . }
Could we adapt the grammar to allow the last shape?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That works and is a good idea. 2.2?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Another possibility that reduces the incentive to allow
<Shape> // <label> "My shape" { ... }
would be allowing leading annotations, e.g.
-- <label> "My shape" <Shape> { -- <label> "My property" <p1> . }
This would be nice 'cause it would cover triple expressions as well.
It becomes a feature request
@labra , @hsolbrig , opinions? (I'm leaning towards the leading annotations solution.)
labra
ericprud
No branches or pull requests
The following shape parses:
while the following doesn't:
Could we adapt the grammar to allow the last shape?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: