We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Current grammar forces us to do things like this:
:User { $$:name schema:name . } :Employee { &$:name ; }
Instead of:
:User { $:name schema:name . } :Employee { &:name ; }
The problem is that there is a conflict with '$' token between this two rules:
This also affects to rule number [50]:
'$' is repeated and should be removed in the rule [42]. If we removed '$' in the rule [40] we don't fix the conflict with the rule [50].
This problem is located in the master branch grammar and also in the shex2.1 branch grammar , but seems to be good in ShExDoc.g4 file
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
we should s/\$/$$$/g so it parses spam subject lines like "earn $$$ now!" though i guess your point is that we're already claiming to parse "$$".
The normative doc is the spec which specifies as a tripleExprLabel without a '$'. We need to make the grammar branch align with that.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Current grammar forces us to do things like this:
Instead of:
The problem is that there is a conflict with '$' token between this two rules:
This also affects to rule number [50]:
'$' is repeated and should be removed in the rule [42]. If we removed '$' in the rule [40] we don't fix the conflict with the rule [50].
This problem is located in the master branch grammar and also in the shex2.1 branch grammar , but seems to be good in ShExDoc.g4 file
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: