Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About magic_point_coco_train.yaml #22

Open
foxkw opened this issue Oct 14, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

About magic_point_coco_train.yaml #22

foxkw opened this issue Oct 14, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@foxkw
Copy link

foxkw commented Oct 14, 2022

Hi, thanks for your great job.
I want to train magicpoint on kitti , so is it needed to use magic_point_coco_train.yaml ? I noticed there is a path of labels. but how to ensure its correctness so as to train magicpoint ? because if the label result generated in the previous step is average, what is the significance of this step of train magicpoint ?

@shaofengzeng
Copy link
Owner

shaofengzeng commented Nov 27, 2022

Sorry for the late reply. I think you have to use magic_point_coco_train.yaml to train your magicpoint, the training process is independent of the data. magic_point_coco_train.yaml is used to train the magicpoint model with labeled coco images (the labels are generated by magic model trained by synthetic data, you can learn more by reading the readme.txt). In general, visualization is the simplest and most effective way to verify your training results, so just show your predictions~

@foxkw
Copy link
Author

foxkw commented Jan 16, 2023

Sorry for the late reply. I think you have to use magic_point_coco_train.yaml to train your magicpoint, the training process is independent of the data. magic_point_coco_train.yaml is used to train the magicpoint model with labeled coco images (the labels are generated by magic model trained by synthetic data, you can learn more by reading the readme.txt). In general, visualization is the simplest and most effective way to verify your training results, so just show your predictions~

I found that the magipoint model will miss some points when export the label on images, so that the corner detection of the lane is unstable in the continuous frame image. This seems to indicate that magipoint also has shortcomings in the export label stage. Do you have any good ideas, improve it, and look forward to your reply

@shaofengzeng
Copy link
Owner

We select feature points according to the probability of predicted by magicpoint (as well as NMS), therefore, some points that people think should be feature points may be omitted

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants