-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
species groups lost citations #55
Comments
Just noticed that the citations are with the OTUs, but they don't show on TP. |
Discussed in Wednesday Session 12 Jun 2024: Citations of superspecies – which name should be cited? Try with OTU, check TP, if it doesn't work try Browse Nom. with verbatim combination. |
Poecilimon and Isophya done. Other genera with species groups: verify: species group Hapithus (Orocharis) (saussurei) - deleted not yet in OSF: groups of Misythus (Hebard 1923), but these don't have diagnoses. |
google is a great tool! |
Brunner von Wattenwyl 1878 isn't correct, belongs to species. Çıplak et al. 2023 just added. Five citations are missing.
The same happend to other (all?) species groups (old OSF) / superspecies (TW).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: