You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Need to regression test this along with uintmax_t ctor to make sure neither tread on eachother's toes.
Currently, trying to construct Nat from double directly will bind to uintmax_t ctor. That's fine, but we don't want to inverse to happen (casting uintmax_t to double will lose precision!) so we should test both. In an ideal world, we'd have both as separate ctors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Need to regression test this along with uintmax_t ctor to make sure neither tread on eachother's toes.
Currently, trying to construct Nat from double directly will bind to uintmax_t ctor. That's fine, but we don't want to inverse to happen (casting uintmax_t to double will lose precision!) so we should test both. In an ideal world, we'd have both as separate ctors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: