These tests are still valuable for use cases where users have tests that do not use describe to wrap their tests. We should keep these as is and instead add new tests that wrap them with describe

After testing this with the original tests by running yarn test and then allure serve I noticed that this new implementation does not support tests that are not wrapped in describe which would be breaking current functionality. We should be able to support tests that are wrapped either with or without the describe blocks.

I also noticed that the test file name is not the highest layer of the tests report. To match other Allure library implementations this would be something we should support. Especially for cases where there are multiple describe blocks with the same name.

One interesting way i've seen this implemented is in the Allure Jasmine library. They solve this by collecting the describe layers via Jasmine's suiteStarted and suiteDone hooks. The equivalent of this hook would be the start_describe_definition and finish_describe_definition jest environment events.

Something like this could allow us to detect wether the test is in fact wrapped in a describe block. Then we can collect the layers of describe block. Then once the finish_describe_definition is called for that block we would remove it from the collection. All while supporting nested describe blocks, and not effecting current implementation that supports tests without describe blocks.

file name is not the highest layer of the tests report

for example, I have very long spec files and for convenience I divide them into several files, but the tests in these files have a common describe and in the report I would like to see all these tests in one describe group

sorry, but my knowledge is probably not enough to implement this in the way you suggest using the start_describe_definition and finish_describe_definition events))
i'm trying to combine mine implementation with youth
i'm added extra check for tests without describe and if it exists - use old logic with file path

	private addSuiteLabelsToTestCase(currentTest: AllureTest, parent: jest.Circus.DescribeBlock, testPath: string): AllureTest {
		const isWindows = os.type() === 'Windows_NT';
		const pathDelimiter = isWindows ? '\\' : '/';
		const pathsArray = testPath.split(pathDelimiter);

		const [parentSuite, ...suites] = pathsArray;
		const subSuite = suites.pop();

		if ((parent?.parent as any)?.parent?.parent && (parent?.parent as any)?.parent?.parent.name === 'ROOT_DESCRIBE_BLOCK') {
			currentTest.addLabel(LabelName.PARENT_SUITE, (parent.parent as any).parent.name);
			currentTest.addLabel(LabelName.SUITE, (parent.parent as any).name);
			currentTest.addLabel(LabelName.SUB_SUITE, parent.name);
		} else if ((parent?.parent as any)?.parent && (parent?.parent as any)?.parent.name === 'ROOT_DESCRIBE_BLOCK') {
			currentTest.addLabel(LabelName.PARENT_SUITE, (parent.parent as any).name);
			currentTest.addLabel(LabelName.SUITE, (parent as any).name);
		} else if ((parent as any)?.parent && (parent as any)?.parent.name === 'ROOT_DESCRIBE_BLOCK') {
			currentTest.addLabel(LabelName.PARENT_SUITE, (parent as any).name);
		} else {
			if (parentSuite) {
				currentTest.addLabel(LabelName.PARENT_SUITE, parentSuite);
				currentTest.addLabel(LabelName.PACKAGE, parentSuite);
			}
			if (suites.length > 0) {
				currentTest.addLabel(LabelName.SUITE, suites.join(' > '));
			}
			if (subSuite) {
				currentTest.addLabel(LabelName.SUB_SUITE, subSuite);
			}
		}
		 
		return currentTest;
	}

it will look like

can you check it and if this option is suitable I will make a commit

@ryparker can you take me any feedback