You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When calculating NBestat this point we make sure that the forward and backward passes produce the same score within a certain tolerance.
Depending on the model, one could allow for different tolerances. Can we avoid hardcoding this to 100?
I have the case of bestScore_ (my understanding says this is forward score) equal to 0.228684 and bwdScore of the start node equal to 0.228682. I assume this difference to be negligible, however, with tolerance 100 this is gonna crash.
ADD: tolerance 1000 would already work
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When calculating
NBest
at this point we make sure that the forward and backward passes produce the same score within a certain tolerance.Depending on the model, one could allow for different tolerances. Can we avoid hardcoding this to
100
?I have the case of
bestScore_
(my understanding says this is forward score) equal to 0.228684 andbwdScore
of the start node equal to 0.228682. I assume this difference to be negligible, however, with tolerance100
this is gonna crash.ADD: tolerance
1000
would already workThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: