Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better idempotent check handling #9

Open
drew-russell opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Better idempotent check handling #9

drew-russell opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@drew-russell
Copy link
Contributor

What would you like to be added:

Determine a better way to handle idempotent checks.

Why is this needed:

We currently return an err if the idempotent check passes (i.e No change required) which is not ideal as it's not actually an error. We need to figure out a better way to handle this. Something like returning nil if the pass checks etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant