You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm learning cairo, so it's very possible I'm making a mistake here, so thank you ahead of time for your patience!
From what I know, Cairo exposes functions cairo_ft_scaled_font_lock_face and cairo_ft_scaled_font_unlock_face to make sure Freetype functions are not called simultaneously. cl-cairo2 wraps these two functions in the macro with-ft-scaled-face-locked. However, the two foreign functions that with-ft-scaled-face-locked uses are only available if I load either the system cl-cairo2-xcb or cl-cairo2-xlib.
I want to use Freetype fonts to write to a memory region attached to a Wayland wl_buffer. I'm under the impression that xcb and xlib are competitor libraries implementing the client-side of the X protocol, which I don't need for this use case. Do these libraries provide something beyond that, which Freetype font locking needs to work, or is this an artificial restriction?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm learning cairo, so it's very possible I'm making a mistake here, so thank you ahead of time for your patience!
From what I know, Cairo exposes functions
cairo_ft_scaled_font_lock_face
andcairo_ft_scaled_font_unlock_face
to make sure Freetype functions are not called simultaneously.cl-cairo2
wraps these two functions in the macrowith-ft-scaled-face-locked
. However, the two foreign functions thatwith-ft-scaled-face-locked
uses are only available if I load either the systemcl-cairo2-xcb
orcl-cairo2-xlib
.I want to use Freetype fonts to write to a memory region attached to a Wayland
wl_buffer
. I'm under the impression that xcb and xlib are competitor libraries implementing the client-side of the X protocol, which I don't need for this use case. Do these libraries provide something beyond that, which Freetype font locking needs to work, or is this an artificial restriction?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: