Don't export %>%?

[jonthegeek]

Check how the tidyverse is dealing with %>% vs |>. We have a lot of %>% examples, but it doesn't feel like we should (always) export it.

[juliasilge]

The tidyverse still pretty much exports the magrittr pipe everywhere, like this:
https://github.com/tidyverse/purrr/blob/main/R/reexport-pipe.R

But uses the native pipe in examples via shenanigans like this:
https://github.com/tidyverse/purrr/pull/938/files#diff-63d8ec413a7b4fd902b8f0274a30155deb18ced670033ec5b09cbef42f9ec6ae

If you are only supporting to 'oldrel-1' in your GH action I would just switch everything to the native pipe.

[jonthegeek]

@juliasilge Thanks for the info! I keep forgetting that we're getting close to "base pipe is normal" timeframes! R 4.1.0 was released 2021-05-18, and, more importantly, that's 3.5 years ago, not last week 🙃

I haven't decided for sure how far back we need to go (I don't know for sure that our actions are "right" yet), but you raise something to definitely consider!