-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dynamic latency improvements #712
Labels
Comments
This was referenced Jul 12, 2024
gavv
added a commit
to gavv/roc-toolkit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 11, 2024
- Extract JitterMeter class. - Remove `min_jitter` metric (it is almost always zero or very close to it). - Replace `max_jitter` with `peak_jitter`, which is similar to maximum, but tries to exclude harmless spikes to reduce latency. See comments in JitterMeter for details on the algorithm.
gavv
added a commit
to gavv/roc-toolkit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 13, 2024
- Extract JitterMeter class. - Remove `min_jitter` metric (it is almost always zero or very close to it). - Replace `max_jitter` with `peak_jitter`, which is similar to maximum, but tries to exclude harmless spikes to reduce latency. See comments in JitterMeter for details on the algorithm.
gavv
added a commit
to gavv/roc-toolkit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 13, 2024
- Extract JitterMeter class. - Remove `min_jitter` metric (it is almost always zero or very close to it). - Replace `max_jitter` with `peak_jitter`, which is similar to maximum, but tries to exclude harmless spikes to reduce latency. See comments in JitterMeter for details on the algorithm.
gavv
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 13, 2024
- Extract JitterMeter class. - Remove `min_jitter` metric (it is almost always zero or very close to it). - Replace `max_jitter` with `peak_jitter`, which is similar to maximum, but tries to exclude harmless spikes to reduce latency. See comments in JitterMeter for details on the algorithm.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Follow-up for #688, tasks for future releases:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: