Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use must, should, may terminology along with IDs for each requirement #81

Closed
adurbin-rivos opened this issue Oct 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@adurbin-rivos
Copy link
Collaborator

In the BRS meeting, it was indicated we should use the terms 'must, should, may'. https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/server-soc has usage like that. Additionally, each requirement in that spec has an ID that can be referenced. We should adopt a similar scheme. Ved (@ved-rivos ), do you have specific pointers on the language and asciidoc recipes that help aid this?

@andreiw andreiw self-assigned this Dec 5, 2023
@andreiw
Copy link
Collaborator

andreiw commented Jan 23, 2024

#97

@andreiw andreiw added the fixed label Apr 11, 2024
@andreiw andreiw closed this as completed Apr 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants